2012; 38( 5 ):727 -35. [Links] 16. Kim JY, Lee JS, Park CW. Extracorporeal shock wave treatment is not useful after arthroscopic potter's wheel cuff fixing. Arc Phys Medication Rehabil. 2012; 93( 7 ):1259 -68. [Links] 17. Krasny C, Enenkel M, Aigner N, Wlk M, Landsiedl F (ד"ר משה פרימן). Ultrasound-guided needling combined with shock-wave treatment for the therapy of calcifying tendonitis of the shoulder.
2005; 87( 4 ):501 -7. [Hyperlinks] 18. Galasso O, Amelio E, Riccelli DA, Gasparini G. Short-term end results of extracorporeal shock wave treatment for the treatment of chronic non-calcific tendinopathy of the supraspinatus: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012; 13( 6 ):86. [Links] 19. Engebretsen K, Grotle M, Bautz-Holter E, Ekeberg OM, Juel NG, Brox JI.
Phys Ther. 2011; 91( 1 ):37 -47. [Links] 20. Schofer MD, Hinrichs F, Peterlein CD, Arendt M, Schmitt J. High versus low-energy extracorporeal shock wave therapy of potter's wheel cuff tendinopathy: a prospective, randomised, regulated research. Acta Orthop Belg. 2009; 75( 4 ):452 -8. [Hyperlinks] 21. Hsu CJ, Wang DY, Tseng KF, Fong YC, Hsu HC, Jim YF.
Shoulder Arm Joint Surg. 2008; 17( 1 ):55 -9. [Links] 22. Albert JD, Meadeb J, Guggenbuhl P, Marin F, Benkalfate T, Thomazeau H, et al. High-energy extracorporeal shock-wave treatment for calcifying tendinitis of the potter's wheel cuff: a randomised trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007; 89( 3 ):335 -41. [Hyperlinks] 23. Cacchio A, Paoloni M, Barile A, Don R, de Paulis F, Calvisi V, et al.
Phys Ther. 2006; 86(5):672 -82. [ Hyperlinks] 24. Sabeti-Aschraf M, Dorotka R, Goll A, Trieb K. Extracorporeal shock wave treatment in the treatment of calcific tendinitis of the rotator cuff. Am J Sports Medication. 2005; 33( 9 ):1365 -8. [Links] 25. Pleiner J, Crevenna R, Langenberger H, Keilani M, Nuhr M, Kainberger F, et al.
A randomized regulated test. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2004; 116(15-16):536 -41. [Links] 26. Cosentino R, De Stefano R, Selvi E, Frati E, Manca S, Frediani B, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for chronic calcific tendinitis of the shoulder: solitary blind research study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003; 62( 3 ):248 -50. [Hyperlinks] 27. Loew M, Daecke W, Kusnierczak D, Rahmanzadeh M, Ewerbeck V.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999; 81( 5 ):863 -7. [Links] 28. Chang KV, Chen SY, Chen WS, Tu YK, Chien KL. Comparative performance of focused shock wave therapy of various intensity degrees and also radial shock wave treatment for treating plantar fasciitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.
[Hyperlinks] 29. Rompe JD, Furia J, Weil L, Maffulli N. Shock wave treatment for chronic plantar fasciopathy. Br Med Bull. 2007; 81-82: 183-208. [Hyperlinks] 30. Crawford F, Thomson C. Interventions for treating plantar heel pain. Cochrane Data Source Syst Rev. 2003;-LRB- 3 ): CD000416. [Hyperlinks] 31. Kearney R, Costa ML.
Foot Ankle Int. 2010; 31( 8 ):689 -94. [Hyperlinks] 32. Ogden JA, Alvarez RG, Marlow M. Shockwave therapy for chronic proximal plantar fasciitis: a meta-analysis. Foot Ankle Int. 2002; 23( 4 ):301 -8. [Hyperlinks] 33. Laufer Y, Dar G. Efficiency of thermal and also athermal short-wave diathermy for the management of knee osteoarthritis: an organized testimonial and also meta-analysis.
2012; 20( 9 ):957 -66. [Links] 34. Alves EM, Angrisani AT, Santiago MB. Making use of extracorporeal shock waves in the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a systematic review. Clin Rheumatol. 2009; 28( 11 ):1247 -51. [Links] 35. Del Buono A, Papalia R, Khanduja V, Denaro V, Maffulli N. Monitoring of the greater trochanteric discomfort disorder: an organized testimonial.
2012; 102:115 -23. [Links] 36. Schaden W, Fischer A, Sailer A. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy of nonunion or delayed osseous union. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;-LRB- 387 ):90 -4. [Hyperlinks] 37. Furia JP, Juliano PJ, Wade AM, Schaden W, Mittermayr R. Shock wave therapy compared with extramedullary screw fixation for nonunion or proximal 5th metatarsal metaphyseal-diaphyseal fractures. Shockwave treatment is a relatively new treatment choice in orthopedic and also recovery medication. The effect of shockwaves was first documented during The second world war when the lungs of castaways were kept in mind to be damaged without any type of shallow proof of trauma. It was discovered the shockwaves developed by deepness charges were liable for the interior injuries.
The very first clinical therapy developed from this research was lithotripsy. This allowed concentrated shockwaves to basically liquify kidney stones without medical intervention. Today, over 98% of all kidney rocks are treated with this technology. Using shockwaves to deal with ligament associated discomfort started in the very early 1990s. A professional shockwave is nothing even more than a controlled explosion that creates a sonic pulse, just like a plane damaging the .
The exact device by which shockwave treatment acts to deal with ligament pathology is not recognized. The leading explanation is based on the inflammatory recovery response. It is really felt the shockwaves create microtrauma to the unhealthy tendon tissue. This results in swelling, which permits the body to send out healing cells as well as enhance the blood circulation to the hurt site.
Multiple researches have been carried out to evaluate the effectiveness of shockwave treatment. Several have actually shown a positive response versus sugar pill treatment and others have shown no advantage over sugar pill. No researches have reported any type of substantial adverse effects when made use of for orthopedic conditions. Contraindications to shockwave therapy include hemorrhaging conditions and also maternity.
High-energy therapies are administered in the operating space with regional or general anesthesia. Low-energy treatments are administered in the clinic and also do not require anesthesia or injections. SCOI presently uses a low-energy device. A technician puts the probe on the location of best inflammation as well as the shockwaves are provided over 10 20 mins.
People are typically treated with 3 5 sessions divided by a week. Between therapies, people are able to execute all typical daily activities. Some individuals report instant pain relief yet the recovery response usually needs 6 8 weeks. Very early results are motivating and also research proceeds at multiple websites around the nation.